Follow up Israel Expanding its presence in the Arabian Gulf by promoting a “defense alliance” that includes Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, similar to “NATO” to deal with the “growing Iranian threat” in the region, according to what it revealed Israeli reports Last month, what was later confirmed in early March by Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz.
On this, Paul Pillar, an expert in American intelligence and defense affairs, says that it seems that the Gulf countries that will join this alliance are “concerned about getting into bed deeply with Israel,” but this step takes into account the recent “improvement” in relations between Israel and many Arab countries. After the round of normalization agreements that Donald Trump made for Israel before his departure from the White House.
According to the information that you have transmitted The Israeli PressThe aforementioned defense alliance talks come in response to the “growing Iranian threat” in the region, especially with regard to its emerging nuclear program, as well as its increasing influence in the Middle East with countries such as Syria and Iraq.
“Not peace … Defense and security cooperation is the core of normalization agreements with Israel.”
Pilar, who worked as a high-ranking American intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia, says that the main motive behind the Gulf governments holding normalization agreements with Israel, which were called “Abraham” agreements – referring to peace between the three monotheistic religions – is a security motive, not a “breach of goodwill and peace.” It also promotes it. In addition to the desire of the Israeli government to prove that the continuation of the conflict with the Palestinians and the continuing effective annexation of the lands inhabited by the Palestinians, Israel will not be judged by ostracism by the Arab region.
He sees Pilar in an analysis published in a journal national interest The American administration, that whatever the Israeli government desires, greatly influences, of course, how to deal with any issue in the American political discourse. On the issue at hand, the association with these Gulf capitals was particularly evident during the Trump administration, which exaggerated the relationship not only to appeal to the big financiers in the constituencies that support the Israeli government, but also to refer to these agreements as “achievements” of American foreign policy.
Pointing out that “the Trump administration was forced to bribe Arab governments to move to full diplomatic relations with Israel.” For the UAE, the bribes were F-35 fighter jets and other advanced military equipment that Abu Dhabi had been anxious to acquire for many years.
As for Sudan, bribery was written off from the lists of terrorism and the doors that had been closed to it during the rule of Al-Bashir were opened. As for Morocco, the bribery was the provision of additional weapons and the abandonment of the old American neutrality in the Western Sahara conflict. These bribes show that the motivation behind the “relationship upgrades” was not due to “the peaceful intentions that these parties suddenly discovered that they hold each other!”
Pilar adds: None of the Arab countries participating in the recent normalization agreements were in a previous war with Israel. They have already had great cooperation with it including on security matters, even without full diplomatic relations. In fact, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is talking – according to Israeli reports – with Israel about a “defense alliance” in the absence of full or declared diplomatic relations between Riyadh and Tel Aviv.
This shows that “peace agreements” are a misnomer when applied to such agreements. The “American bribes” after these agreements have moved matters away from peace in more than one place. And any possibility of peace between Israel and the Palestinians has become more remote after these agreements. The idea of an “outside-in” settlement that involves pressure from Arab governments on the Palestinians fails in the face of the fact that the Palestinians – as the oppressed party – have almost nothing left for them to concede.
“Israel is dragging the Gulf states into the arena of conflict with Iran”
And in the Gulf, the development of Military alliances As for Israel with the Arab countries against Iran, or what Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz calls “special security arrangements”, it will sharpen the paths of the conflict. It will drag the Gulf states into the arena of perpetual enmity between Israel and Iran, which is rife with threats of military attack at any moment.
Just last week, Gantz spoke publicly about lists of Iranian targets that Israel is preparing to attack if Iran continues its aspirations to acquire a nuclear weapon. Israel is now trying to reproduce “the system of hostility and interlocking alliances in Europe that helped in the outbreak of the First World War, but on a smaller scale,” by pulling out Pilar’s description.
Adding that “the general principle that it is good for these countries to have full relations with Israel necessarily means other countries, and in the Arab Gulf region this goal will be strengthened through defense alliances with comprehensive participation, which will inevitably lead to an increase in tensions across the Gulf.”
According to Israeli reports, this military alliance that Israel is looking for with the Gulf countries comes at a time when the new Biden administration sends signals to Tehran and the world powers that it is ready to join the Iranian nuclear deal even if it has some amendments or conditions placed on it, something that does not Israel continues to reject him altogether, and he continues to anger the Gulf people.
Today, Tuesday, March 2, 2021, Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz confirmed that Israel is working to establish “A regional security alliance with the Gulf states that have relations with Israel and share concerns about Iran.”
Gantz had stated that “Israel will establish defense relations with every country that has relations with it.” He added, “We are keenly seeking to establish a special security arrangement, and we can continue to develop our relations within this framework with several countries and capitals in the region.”